Imatra, a city in Finland, offers a healthcare system that is characterized by a healthcare index of 59.72. The system is primarily supported by public insurance, providing coverage to half of its residents. Despite the availability of public insurance, the city faces challenges with responsiveness and waiting times.

Healthcare Accessibility and Coverage

Healthcare in Imatra is predominantly accessible through public insurance, which covers 50% of the population.

The remaining 50% of residents are uninsured, highlighting a significant gap in coverage.

Coverage Breakdown
Public
50%
None
50%

Cost of Healthcare

The cost of healthcare in Imatra is perceived as moderate, with a score of 0.50. Public insurance plays a crucial role in managing healthcare expenses for residents.

Emergency Services and Speed

Emergency services in Imatra are noted for their exceptional speed, with a score of 1.50. This indicates a highly efficient response system, ensuring timely medical attention during emergencies.

Public Health Initiatives

Imatra is engaged in public health initiatives aimed at improving healthcare accessibility and reducing waiting times. These initiatives are crucial for addressing the current challenges in the healthcare system.

Equipment and Advancements

The availability of modern medical equipment in Imatra is limited, as indicated by a score of 0.00. This suggests a need for investment in medical technology to enhance healthcare delivery.

Worldwide
Finland

Healthcare Rankings

The Health Care Rankings for Finland evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Finland, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.

Best to WorstUpdated: Dec, 2024
Imatra Healthcare

"Key Takeaways"

Imatra's healthcare system relies heavily on public insurance, covering half of its residents.

There is a significant portion of the population without insurance, indicating a gap in coverage.

Emergency services are highly efficient, though there is room for improvement in responsiveness and medical technology.