Chalandri, a suburb of Athens, Greece, boasts a robust healthcare system with a high healthcare index of 77.78. The city is known for its skilled healthcare professionals and efficient service delivery. Despite the reliance on private insurance, the healthcare system is perceived as competent and courteous.
Healthcare in Chalandri is predominantly accessed through private insurance, with 100% of the insured population relying on private plans.
There is no significant presence of employer-sponsored or public insurance, highlighting a unique reliance on private healthcare solutions.
The negative score for responsiveness and waiting times (-1.00) indicates potential challenges in accessing timely care despite the overall efficiency.
Healthcare costs in Chalandri are perceived as high, with a cost score of 1.00. The reliance on private insurance may contribute to these perceptions, as out-of-pocket expenses can vary significantly.
Emergency services in Chalandri are highly efficient, with a top speed score of 2.00. Residents benefit from rapid response times and effective emergency care, ensuring urgent medical needs are promptly addressed.
Chalandri focuses on enhancing healthcare accessibility and quality through various local health programs. Efforts are made to improve health education and preventive care, although specific public health initiatives are less prominent compared to larger cities.
The score for modern equipment is notably low at 0.00, suggesting limited access to the latest medical technology. This may impact the availability of advanced medical treatments and diagnostics within the city.
The Health Care Rankings for Greece evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Greece, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.
Chalandri's healthcare system is characterized by high competency and courteous service.
The city relies heavily on private insurance, with no significant public or employer-sponsored options.
Emergency services are efficient, but there may be challenges with waiting times for non-emergency care.
Limited access to modern medical equipment could affect the quality of advanced healthcare services.