Kiryat Motzkin, a city in Israel, presents a challenging healthcare landscape with a low healthcare index of 5.56. The city's healthcare system faces significant hurdles in terms of cost, accessibility, and service quality. Residents primarily rely on private insurance, which impacts the overall accessibility and affordability of healthcare services.

Healthcare Accessibility and Coverage

Healthcare accessibility in Kiryat Motzkin is heavily reliant on private insurance, with 100% of insured residents using private plans.

There is no employer-sponsored or public insurance coverage, which may limit access for some residents.

Coverage Breakdown
Private
100%

Cost of Healthcare

The cost of healthcare in Kiryat Motzkin is perceived as very high, with a cost score of -2.00. This high cost can be a barrier to accessing necessary medical services, especially for those without comprehensive private insurance.

Emergency Services and Speed

Emergency services in Kiryat Motzkin are notably slow, with a speed score of 0.00. This indicates potential delays in receiving urgent medical care, which could impact patient outcomes.

Public Health Initiatives

There is limited information on public health initiatives in Kiryat Motzkin, reflecting the challenges in the current healthcare system.

Equipment and Advancements

The availability of modern medical equipment in Kiryat Motzkin is rated very low, with a score of -2.00. This suggests that residents may not have access to the latest medical technologies and treatments.

Worldwide
Israel

Healthcare Rankings

The Health Care Rankings for Israel evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Israel, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.

Best to WorstUpdated: Dec, 2024
Kiryat Motzkin Healthcare

"Key Takeaways"

Kiryat Motzkin's healthcare system faces significant challenges, including high costs and limited accessibility.

The reliance on private insurance without public or employer-sponsored options restricts healthcare access for many residents.

Emergency services are slow, and the lack of modern equipment further hampers the quality of care available.