In 2024, Cuneo, Italy, sees a predominant reliance on cars for commuting, with 100% of the population using this mode of transport. The city's traffic inefficiency index is relatively low, indicating a smoother flow of traffic compared to more congested urban areas.
Traffic in Cuneo tends to be more manageable during the winter months, as fewer tourists visit the area. Summer months may see increased traffic due to tourism, impacting commute times.
Limited public transportation options force reliance on cars, increasing traffic congestion. High CO2 emissions are a concern for environmentally conscious residents.
Early mornings and late evenings are the best times to travel to avoid any potential traffic build-up. Midday travel is generally smooth due to lower traffic volumes.
Public events, such as local festivals, can lead to temporary road closures and increased traffic. Planning routes in advance during events can help mitigate delays.
Cuneo is exploring initiatives to enhance cycling infrastructure to encourage more sustainable commuting. Efforts are being made to increase the availability and efficiency of public transport options.
Ride-sharing services are gradually gaining popularity, offering an alternative to car ownership. These services help reduce the number of vehicles on the road, potentially lowering traffic congestion.
The Traffic Index for Italy combines user-contributed data on commute times, traffic dissatisfaction, CO2 emissions, and traffic system inefficiencies in Italy, to provide insights into overall traffic conditions.
Cuneo's reliance on cars for commuting contributes to high CO2 emissions.
Introducing and promoting alternative transport modes could improve environmental outcomes and reduce traffic inefficiency.
Cuneo has a high CO2 emission index of 2660, primarily due to the exclusive use of cars.
Efforts to reduce emissions could focus on promoting alternative transportation methods.
TimeThe time index is relatively low at 10, suggesting minimal delays in traffic.
This indicates efficient traffic flow for car users in the city.
InefficiencyThe inefficiency index stands at 22.86, which is moderate and suggests room for improvement.
Strategies to enhance public transport options could further reduce inefficiency.