In 2024, Jelgava, Latvia, sees a significant portion of its population commuting by foot, with walking accounting for 66.67% of all transportation modes. Car usage remains a substantial part of the city's transportation, representing 33.33% of the commuting methods, highlighting a reliance on personal vehicles.
Winter months may see increased car usage due to colder weather, impacting walking commutes. Summer festivals and events could lead to temporary spikes in traffic congestion.
Limited public transportation options may force reliance on cars for longer commutes. Pedestrian pathways could be improved to accommodate the high number of walking commuters.
Early mornings and late evenings are typically less congested, offering smoother commutes. Avoid peak hours between 8-9 AM and 5-6 PM to minimize travel delays.
Public events, especially during the summer, can lead to significant traffic disruptions. Planning alternative routes during major events can help mitigate delays.
Jelgava is exploring initiatives to enhance green spaces and promote eco-friendly transportation. Efforts to increase bicycle lanes and pedestrian zones are underway to support sustainable commuting.
Ride-sharing services are gradually influencing commuting patterns, offering flexible alternatives to car ownership. These services can help reduce the number of cars on the road, potentially lowering traffic congestion.
The Traffic Index for Latvia combines user-contributed data on commute times, traffic dissatisfaction, CO2 emissions, and traffic system inefficiencies in Latvia, to provide insights into overall traffic conditions.
Promoting cycling and public transportation could further reduce CO2 emissions and traffic inefficiencies.
Enhancing pedestrian infrastructure may support the high percentage of walking commuters.
Jelgava's CO2 emissions index is at 2216.67, indicating a moderate environmental impact from transportation.
Efforts to reduce emissions could focus on promoting alternative transportation methods.
TimeThe time index stands at 18.33, reflecting the average time spent commuting.
This suggests a relatively efficient commute time compared to larger urban areas.
InefficiencyThe inefficiency index is 47.72, pointing to potential areas for improvement in traffic flow and management.
Addressing inefficiencies could enhance overall commuting experiences.