Metn, a district in Lebanon, offers a robust healthcare system characterized by a healthcare index of 63.89. The region is known for its modern medical facilities and skilled healthcare professionals. Despite the high quality of care, the cost of healthcare remains a significant concern for residents.
Healthcare in Metn is predominantly accessed through private insurance, which covers 100% of the insured population.
There is no public or employer-sponsored insurance, highlighting a reliance on private healthcare solutions.
The negative score for responsiveness and waiting times (-1.00) indicates potential delays in accessing healthcare services. Efforts are needed to improve the efficiency of service delivery to meet patient expectations.
Healthcare costs in Metn are perceived as high, with a cost score of -1.00. Residents often face significant out-of-pocket expenses due to the lack of public insurance options.
Emergency services in Metn are highly efficient, with a speed score of 1.00. The region is equipped to handle urgent medical situations promptly, ensuring patient safety and care.
Metn has several public health initiatives aimed at improving community health, including vaccination programs and health education campaigns. These initiatives are crucial in promoting preventive care and reducing the burden of chronic diseases.
Healthcare facilities in Metn are equipped with modern medical technology, reflected in a high score of 1.00 for modern equipment. This ensures that residents have access to advanced diagnostic and treatment options.
The Health Care Rankings for Lebanon evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Lebanon, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.
Metn's healthcare system is characterized by high-quality care and modern facilities, though it is heavily reliant on private insurance.
The cost of healthcare is a significant concern, with no public insurance options available.
Emergency services are efficient, but there is room for improvement in responsiveness and waiting times.