In Tiel, Netherlands, walking is the predominant mode of transportation, accounting for 100% of all commutes. The city's traffic data reveals minimal reliance on motorized transport, with a focus on sustainable commuting practices.
During winter, walking might be less favorable due to weather conditions, potentially increasing reliance on other modes. Summer months see a rise in walking and cycling, as favorable weather encourages outdoor commuting.
Limited infrastructure for non-walking modes can be a challenge during adverse weather conditions. High CO2 emissions remain a concern despite the predominance of walking.
Early mornings and late evenings are ideal for walking, avoiding peak pedestrian traffic. Midday offers a quieter time for walking, especially in residential areas.
Local festivals and markets can increase pedestrian traffic, impacting commute times. Public events often lead to temporary road closures, necessitating alternative walking routes.
Tiel is investing in pedestrian-friendly infrastructure to support sustainable commuting. Initiatives to plant more trees along walking paths aim to enhance the walking experience and reduce CO2 levels.
Ride-sharing services have minimal impact due to the dominance of walking. Potential exists for ride-sharing to complement walking during adverse weather conditions.
The Traffic Index for Netherlands combines user-contributed data on commute times, traffic dissatisfaction, CO2 emissions, and traffic system inefficiencies in Netherlands, to provide insights into overall traffic conditions.
Walking is the most efficient and popular mode of transport in Tiel, reducing reliance on cars and public transport.
Despite high CO2 emissions, the focus on walking presents opportunities for sustainable urban planning.
Tiel has a CO2 emission index of 100, indicating high emissions relative to the city's size.
Efforts to reduce emissions could focus on promoting non-motorized transport even further.
TimeThe time index of 40 suggests moderate delays in commuting times.
Walking as the primary mode helps mitigate extensive traffic delays.
InefficiencyThe inefficiency index stands at 24.54, indicating room for improvement in traffic management.
Optimizing pedestrian pathways could enhance efficiency further.