Iasi, a prominent city in Romania, offers a healthcare system that is evolving to meet the needs of its residents. With a healthcare index of 56.33, the city is working towards improving its medical services and infrastructure. Despite some challenges, such as longer wait times, Iasi continues to make strides in healthcare delivery.
Healthcare in Iasi is predominantly supported by public insurance, covering 63.9% of the population.
Employer-sponsored insurance accounts for 25%, while private insurance covers 11.1% of residents.
Notably, there is no significant portion of the population without insurance, indicating broad coverage.
The negative score for responsiveness and waiting times (-0.63) highlights a challenge in the system, with patients often experiencing delays in receiving care.
Healthcare costs in Iasi are relatively moderate, with a cost score of 0.28. The presence of public insurance helps to alleviate financial burdens for many residents, making healthcare more affordable.
Emergency services in Iasi have room for improvement, with a speed score of 0.14. Efforts are ongoing to enhance the efficiency and response times of emergency medical services.
Iasi is actively engaged in public health initiatives aimed at improving community health and wellness. Programs focusing on preventive care and chronic disease management are key components of the city's health strategy.
The availability of modern medical equipment in Iasi is developing, with a score of 0.49. Continued investment in technology is essential to advance the quality of healthcare services.
Iasi ranks 3rd on the Healthcare rankings in Romania. The Health Care Rankings for Romania evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Romania, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.
Iasi's healthcare system is supported by a strong public insurance framework, ensuring broad coverage.
While healthcare costs are manageable, the city faces challenges with wait times and emergency service efficiency.
Ongoing public health initiatives and investments in modern equipment are crucial for future improvements.