Healthcare Information Nevinnomyssk
Nevinnomyssk, a city in Russia, presents a challenging healthcare landscape with a healthcare index of 18.06. The system is characterized by significant issues in skill and competency, cost, and responsiveness, impacting the overall quality of care.
Healthcare Accessibility and Coverage
Healthcare accessibility in Nevinnomyssk is primarily supported by employer-sponsored and public insurance, each covering 50% of the population.
There is no reliance on private insurance, and the uninsured rate is effectively zero, indicating a structured but limited insurance framework.
Coverage Breakdown
Cost of Healthcare
The cost of healthcare in Nevinnomyssk is perceived as high, with a score of -1.50, suggesting significant financial barriers for residents. Despite the structured insurance coverage, the high costs remain a critical concern for the population.
Emergency Services and Speed
Emergency services in Nevinnomyssk are notably slow, with a speed score of -1.50, indicating delays in response times and service delivery.
Public Health Initiatives
There is limited information on specific public health initiatives in Nevinnomyssk, reflecting the broader challenges in the healthcare system.
Equipment and Advancements
The availability of modern medical equipment in Nevinnomyssk is limited, with a score of -1.50, impacting the quality and effectiveness of healthcare services.
Healthcare Rankings
The Health Care Rankings for Russia evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Russia, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.
"Key Takeaways"
Nevinnomyssk faces significant challenges in its healthcare system, with low scores in skill, cost, and responsiveness.
The city's healthcare infrastructure lacks modern equipment and specialized providers, affecting service quality.
Insurance coverage is evenly split between employer-sponsored and public options, but high costs remain a barrier.