Sevastopol's healthcare system is a critical component of the city's infrastructure, providing essential services to its residents. With a healthcare index of 65.74, the city offers a moderately positive healthcare environment, though challenges remain in areas such as modern equipment and insurance coverage.
Healthcare in Sevastopol is primarily accessible through public insurance, covering 66.7% of the population.
A significant portion of the population, 33.3%, remains uninsured, highlighting a gap in comprehensive coverage.
The responsiveness and waiting times score of 0.17 indicates that while services are available, there may be delays in accessing care.
Healthcare costs in Sevastopol are perceived as relatively high, with a cost score of 1.17. This suggests that residents may face financial challenges when accessing medical services, particularly those without insurance.
Emergency services in Sevastopol have a moderate speed score of 0.33, indicating room for improvement in response times. Efforts to enhance the efficiency of emergency care could benefit the overall healthcare system.
Sevastopol is actively working on public health initiatives aimed at improving healthcare accessibility and promoting preventive care. Programs focusing on chronic disease management and vaccination campaigns are key components of the city's public health strategy.
The score for modern equipment in Sevastopol is -0.50, suggesting that there is a need for investment in up-to-date medical technology. Enhancing the availability of modern equipment could significantly improve the quality of healthcare services.
The Health Care Rankings for Russia evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Russia, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.
Sevastopol's healthcare system offers a moderately positive environment with a healthcare index of 65.74.
Public insurance covers a majority of the population, but a significant uninsured rate remains a challenge.
High healthcare costs and moderate emergency service speeds indicate areas for potential improvement.
Investment in modern medical equipment is necessary to enhance healthcare quality.