In 2024, Gyeonggi, South Korea, sees walking as the predominant mode of transportation, with 100% of commuters choosing this method. The city's traffic data reveals minimal CO2 emissions and a focus on pedestrian-friendly infrastructure.
Traffic patterns remain consistent throughout the year due to the dominance of walking. Seasonal weather changes may affect walking conditions, but do not significantly alter traffic flow.
Limited transportation options may inconvenience those unable to walk long distances. Pedestrian pathways may require enhancements to accommodate all users comfortably.
Walking is efficient at any time of day, given the absence of vehicular traffic. Early mornings and late evenings offer the most pleasant walking conditions.
Public events can lead to increased pedestrian traffic, requiring effective crowd management. Festivals and cultural events may temporarily alter walking routes.
Gyeonggi is committed to maintaining low emissions through its pedestrian-focused transportation system. The city invests in expanding and improving pedestrian pathways to support sustainable commuting.
Ride-sharing services have minimal impact due to the predominant use of walking. There is potential for ride-sharing to complement walking by providing last-mile connectivity.
The Traffic Index for South Korea combines user-contributed data on commute times, traffic dissatisfaction, CO2 emissions, and traffic system inefficiencies in South Korea, to provide insights into overall traffic conditions.
Gyeonggi's transportation system is highly pedestrian-centric, with walking being the sole mode of commute.
There is potential to improve pedestrian infrastructure to further reduce inefficiencies.
Gyeonggi's CO2 emissions from transportation are negligible due to the exclusive use of walking.
The city's focus on pedestrian pathways contributes to its low environmental impact.
TimeThe average time index is 23.33, reflecting the efficient nature of walking as a commuting method.
Commuters experience minimal delays, enhancing overall travel efficiency.
InefficiencyThe inefficiency index stands at 26.44, indicating room for improvement in pedestrian infrastructure.
Despite the reliance on walking, there are opportunities to enhance the walking experience.