Gothenburg, Sweden, showcases a diverse range of transportation options with cars being the most popular mode of commuting. The city's traffic patterns reveal significant usage of walking and trams, contributing to a balanced urban mobility landscape.

Average Commute Times

The average commute involves 1.37 minutes waiting, 9.83 minutes driving, and 4.58 minutes walking over a distance of 11.79 km.
  • Bus - Bus commuters spend 4.6 minutes waiting and 29.4 minutes on the bus, covering 11.2 km.
  • Car - Car users experience a driving time of 24.33 minutes with minimal walking, covering 21.33 km.
  • Train - Train commuters wait 6 minutes and travel for 9 minutes by train, with additional walking, covering 2 km.
  • Walking - Walking commuters spend 13.27 minutes walking, with minor tram and bus usage, covering 2.45 km.
Traffic Breakdown
Car
39%
Walking
20%
Tram
15%
Bicycle
11%
Bus
9%
Home
4%
Train
2%
Seasonal Trends

Winter months often see increased car usage due to colder weather, impacting traffic flow. Summer festivals and events can lead to temporary spikes in public transport usage.

Commuter Pain Points

Traffic congestion during peak hours remains a significant challenge for car commuters. Limited train frequency can lead to longer waiting times for train users.

Best Travel Times

Traveling outside of peak morning (7-9 AM) and evening (4-6 PM) hours can significantly reduce commute times. Midday and late evening are optimal for avoiding traffic congestion.

Event Impacts

Large public events, such as concerts and sports matches, can cause temporary disruptions in traffic patterns. Advance planning and increased public transport services are recommended during such events.

Sustainability Efforts

Gothenburg is investing in green public transport solutions to reduce its carbon footprint. The city encourages cycling through expanded bike lanes and public awareness campaigns.

Ride-Sharing Impact

Ride-sharing services are gaining popularity, offering flexible commuting options and reducing the need for personal car ownership. These services help alleviate parking issues and contribute to reduced traffic congestion.

Worldwide
Sweden

Traffic Rankings

Gothenburg ranks 2nd on the Traffic rankings in Sweden. The Traffic Index for Sweden combines user-contributed data on commute times, traffic dissatisfaction, CO2 emissions, and traffic system inefficiencies in Sweden, to provide insights into overall traffic conditions.

Worst to BestUpdated: Dec, 2024

Traffic Data

The following traffic data has been gathered from 54 user contributions.
Overall average travel
Distance
7.3 miles
Walking
4.6 mins
Waiting
1.4 mins
Driving Car
9.8 mins
Bus / Trolley
3.5 mins
Bicycle
1.6 mins
Motorcycle
0.0 mins
Train
0.2 mins
Tram
2.9 mins
Other
0.1 mins
Total:
24.1 mins
Average when primarily using Bus
Distance
7.0 miles
Walking
3.8 mins
Waiting
4.6 mins
Bus / Trolley
29.4 mins
Total:
37.8 mins
Average when primarily using Car
Distance
13.3 miles
Walking
1.4 mins
Driving Car
24.3 mins
Total:
25.7 mins
Average when primarily using Train
Distance
1.2 miles
Walking
6.0 mins
Waiting
6.0 mins
Bus / Trolley
2.0 mins
Train
9.0 mins
Total:
23.0 mins
Average when primarily using Walking
Distance
1.5 miles
Walking
13.3 mins
Waiting
1.1 mins
Bus / Trolley
1.2 mins
Bicycle
0.5 mins
Motorcycle
0.0 mins
Tram
0.9 mins
Total:
16.9 mins
Gothenburg Traffic

"Key Takeaways"

Promoting alternative transportation modes like cycling and public transport can reduce CO2 emissions.

Improving public transport efficiency could decrease commute times and traffic congestion.

Key Indexes

Emissions

Gothenburg's CO2 emissions index stands at 2848.96, reflecting the environmental impact of transportation.

Efforts to reduce emissions are crucial as car usage remains high.

Time

The average commute time index is 24.11, indicating moderate traffic delays.

Peak hours contribute significantly to increased travel times.

Inefficiency

The inefficiency index is 108.66, suggesting room for improvement in traffic flow.

Public transport enhancements could alleviate inefficiencies.