Adelanto, a city in California, presents a challenging healthcare landscape with a healthcare index of 19.44. The city's healthcare system faces significant hurdles, including low scores in skill and competency, speed, and accuracy. Residents often encounter difficulties in accessing timely and effective medical care.
Healthcare accessibility in Adelanto is limited, with a significant reliance on employer-sponsored (50%) and public insurance (50%).
There is no reported coverage through private insurance, and no residents are uninsured, indicating a binary distribution of insurance types.
The negative score for responsiveness and waiting times (-1.00) highlights considerable delays in accessing healthcare services. Patients may experience long wait times for appointments and treatments.
The cost of healthcare in Adelanto is perceived as neutral, with a score of 0.00. While costs are not seen as excessively high, the quality and speed of service may not justify the expenses for some residents.
Emergency services in Adelanto are notably slow, with a speed score of -2.00. This indicates significant challenges in providing timely emergency care, which could impact patient outcomes.
Public health initiatives in Adelanto are limited, with a focus on basic preventive care and general health education. There is a need for more comprehensive programs to address chronic diseases and mental health.
Healthcare facilities in Adelanto are lacking in modern equipment, with a score of -2.00. This deficiency in technology may hinder the delivery of advanced medical care and limit treatment options.
The Health Care Rankings for the United States evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in United States, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.
Adelanto's healthcare system faces significant challenges, with low scores in skill, speed, and accuracy.
Insurance coverage is split evenly between employer-sponsored and public options, with no private insurance reported.
Emergency services are slow, and the lack of modern equipment impacts the quality of care.