Crime and Pollution in Fukushima
The following data and statistics on crime, pollution, and overall safety in Fukushima are derived from a combination of trusted public sources and insights gathered from over 1 user contributions.
This comprehensive approach helps provide a balanced view of the city's crime rates, environmental concerns, air quality, and public safety. By aggregating information from government reports, environmental studies, and direct feedback from residents, we aim offer an up-to-date and thorough analysis of key factors impacting quality of life in Fukushima.
Crime Data in Fukushima
Crime Perception and Concerns
In 2024, Fukushima's crime data reveals an exceptionally low level of crime, with residents expressing strong confidence in their safety. The city is regarded as one of the safest places in Japan, with minimal public concern over violent or property crimes.
The perception of safety in Fukushima is overwhelmingly positive, with residents feeling secure both during the day and at night.
Some notable concerns include:
- Property CrimesProperty crimes are almost non-existent in Fukushima, with residents reporting little to no concern over theft, break-ins, or damage to vehicles. This low incidence contributes significantly to Fukushima's reputation as a secure city.
- Drug-Related IssuesDrug-related crimes are virtually absent in Fukushima. The lack of drug-related issues further enhances the public's perception of high safety and low crime rates in the city.
- Violent CrimesConcerns about violent crimes such as assault and robbery are negligible in Fukushima. Residents report feeling safe from physical threats, contributing to the overall sense of security.
- Public SafetyPublic safety in Fukushima is excellent, with residents feeling at ease alone at any time of day. This widespread sense of security bolsters community confidence and quality of life.
Crime Trends and Safety
- Rising Crime ConcernsUnlike many urban areas, Fukushima does not face any significant concerns about increasing crime rates. Residents feel confident in the stability of their safety levels.
- Specific FearsThere are virtually no specific fears regarding crime in Fukushima. Issues such as theft and violent crime are almost nonexistent, leading to a very low crime perception overall.
Crime Rankings
Pollution Data in Fukushima
Air Quality and Pollution Levels
Despite its safe reputation, Fukushima faces challenges with air pollution indicators. While particulate matter levels such as PM2.5 and PM10 are recorded as nonexistent, other pollution metrics indicate areas for environmental improvement.
Overall air quality is deemed moderately satisfactory, though residents express some concerns over general environmental health impacts.
- PM2.5 (Fine Particulate Matter)PM2.5 levels are reported at zero, highlighting the absence of fine particulate matter concerns. However, the overall sentiment towards air quality remains cautious.
- PM10 (Coarse Particulate Matter)PM10 levels are also at zero, mitigating fears regarding coarser particulate pollution. Nonetheless, there remain some environmental health concerns.
Waste and Noise Pollution
Fukushima residents report dissatisfaction with waste management and noise pollution, pointing to a need for improved waste disposal services and cleaner community spaces.
Noise pollution, on the other hand, is less concerning to residents, indicating a generally quieter urban environment.
- Garbage Disposal SatisfactionThe community has expressed dissatisfaction with current garbage disposal practices, which impacts overall perceptions of sanitation and tidiness.
- Noise and Light PollutionNoise pollution is relatively well-managed in Fukushima, contributing positively to residents' quality of life compared to other urban environments.
Green Spaces and Water Quality
While Fukushima is known for its safety, residents express moderate dissatisfaction regarding the state of green spaces and water quality, signaling areas needing attention.
The accessibility of drinking water and quality of green spaces could be improved to meet public expectations for environmental standards.
- Green and Parks QualityGreen and park spaces are rated slightly negatively, suggesting a need for more or better-maintained recreational areas to enhance community well-being.
- Drinking Water QualityThe quality and accessibility of drinking water are areas of concern, indicating potential issues with water supply and infrastructure that and need addressing.