The following data and statistics on crime, pollution, and overall safety in Fukushima are derived from a combination of trusted public sources and insights gathered from over 1 user contributions.
This comprehensive approach helps provide a balanced view of the city's crime rates, environmental concerns, air quality, and public safety. By aggregating information from government reports, environmental studies, and direct feedback from residents, we aim offer an up-to-date and thorough analysis of key factors impacting quality of life in Fukushima.
In 2024, Fukushima's crime data reveals an exceptionally low level of crime, with residents expressing strong confidence in their safety. The city is regarded as one of the safest places in Japan, with minimal public concern over violent or property crimes.
The perception of safety in Fukushima is overwhelmingly positive, with residents feeling secure both during the day and at night.
Fukushima is characterized by its exceptionally low crime rates and high public confidence in safety, highlighted by negligible concerns about property and violent crimes. This positive environment is maintained through effective community engagement and law enforcement.
The crime ranking by city for Japan is based on a continuously updated index, incorporating data up to 36 months old and calculated twice a year. Cities are ranked on a scale from "very low" to "very high" crime levels, with safety being the inverse, where a high safety index indicates a safer city.
Despite its safe reputation, Fukushima faces challenges with air pollution indicators. While particulate matter levels such as PM2.5 and PM10 are recorded as nonexistent, other pollution metrics indicate areas for environmental improvement.
Overall air quality is deemed moderately satisfactory, though residents express some concerns over general environmental health impacts.
Fukushima residents report dissatisfaction with waste management and noise pollution, pointing to a need for improved waste disposal services and cleaner community spaces.
Noise pollution, on the other hand, is less concerning to residents, indicating a generally quieter urban environment.
While Fukushima is known for its safety, residents express moderate dissatisfaction regarding the state of green spaces and water quality, signaling areas needing attention.
The accessibility of drinking water and quality of green spaces could be improved to meet public expectations for environmental standards.
The pollution ranking for Japan is based on a combination of visitor perceptions and data from institutions like the World Health Organization. The Pollution Index estimates overall pollution levels by considering air and water pollution, garbage disposal, and other factors, with air pollution given the highest weight, while the Pollution Exp Scale uses an exponential function to highlight extremely polluted cities.
Fukushima is highlighted by its exceptionally low crime rates and high safety perception, fostering a secure living environment.
Environmental challenges such as waste management and air quality remain areas for improvement despite the absence of major particulate pollution.
Residents appreciate the safety but seek enhancements in green spaces and water quality, encouraging future developmental efforts in these areas.