Ventspils, a city in Latvia, offers a healthcare system that is evolving to meet the needs of its residents. With a healthcare index of 56.67, the city is working towards improving its medical services and accessibility. Despite challenges in responsiveness and friendliness, Ventspils is making strides in modernizing its healthcare facilities.
Healthcare in Ventspils is primarily supported by public insurance, covering 60% of the population.
Employer-sponsored insurance accounts for 20%, while another 20% of residents remain uninsured, highlighting a gap in private insurance options.
The negative score for responsiveness and waiting times (-0.40) indicates that residents may experience delays in receiving medical attention. Efforts are needed to improve the efficiency of healthcare services in the city.
The cost of healthcare in Ventspils is perceived as neutral, suggesting that while not overly expensive, there is room for improvement in affordability. Public insurance plays a significant role in managing healthcare expenses for the majority of residents.
Emergency services in Ventspils are relatively efficient, with a speed score of 0.80. This suggests that the city is capable of providing timely emergency care to its residents.
Ventspils is actively engaged in public health initiatives aimed at improving community health and wellness. Programs focusing on preventive care and chronic disease management are key components of the city's health strategy.
Ventspils healthcare facilities are equipped with modern medical technology, boasting a high score of 1.60. This investment in advanced equipment is crucial for enhancing the quality of care and supporting medical advancements.
The Health Care Rankings for Latvia evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Latvia, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.
Ventspils is working towards improving its healthcare system, with a focus on modern equipment and public health initiatives.
Challenges remain in responsiveness and insurance coverage, particularly the lack of private insurance options.
Emergency services are efficient, but overall healthcare accessibility could benefit from further enhancements.