The following data and statistics on crime, pollution, and overall safety in Rostov-on-Don (Rostov-na-donu) are derived from a combination of trusted public sources and insights gathered from over 71 user contributions.
This comprehensive approach helps provide a balanced view of the city's crime rates, environmental concerns, air quality, and public safety. By aggregating information from government reports, environmental studies, and direct feedback from residents, we aim offer an up-to-date and thorough analysis of key factors impacting quality of life in Rostov-on-Don (Rostov-na-donu).
In 2024, Rostov-on-Don presents a moderate crime index of 52.03, indicating a balanced awareness of safety within the city. While the level of crime remains a concern, the community expresses diverse perceptions influenced by varying crime types and times of day.
Residents typically feel safer during daylight but exhibit more apprehension about being alone at night, which underscores a need for enhanced security measures during nocturnal hours.
Rostov-on-Don faces significant challenges concerning air quality, with pollution indices being notably high. This situation calls for urgent action to address sources of pollution and mitigate their impact on public health and environmental sustainability.
Public sentiment towards air quality is markedly negative, emphasizing the need for strategies to improve breathable air and ensure long-term health benefits for resident populations.
The city struggles with waste management and noise pollution, both significant detractors from urban life quality. Noise levels have a marked impact on overall comfort, with waste management needing reforms to boost city cleanliness and livability.
Residents express dissatisfaction with garbage disposal services, often leading to negative perceptions about urban tidiness and environmental wellness in their neighborhoods.
While Rostov-on-Don boasts green spaces that are utilized by the public, improvements in their quality are needed to fully benefit public health and recreation.
The city’s drinking water quality raises concerns, with its apparent insufficiency in meeting community needs and expectations, calling for infrastructural improvements and quality assurance initiatives.