Saratov, a city in Russia, presents a healthcare system that faces several challenges. With a healthcare index of 37.37, the system struggles with efficiency and accessibility. Residents rely heavily on public insurance, which covers the majority of the population.

Healthcare Accessibility and Coverage

Healthcare in Saratov is predominantly supported by public insurance, covering 90.9% of the population.

There is minimal reliance on private insurance, with only 9.1% of residents opting for it.

Employer-sponsored insurance is virtually non-existent, indicating a heavy dependence on state-provided healthcare.

Coverage Breakdown
Public
91%
Private
9%

Cost of Healthcare

The cost of healthcare in Saratov is perceived as neutral, with a score of 0.00. This suggests that while healthcare is affordable, the quality and availability of services may not meet all residents' expectations.

Emergency Services and Speed

Emergency services in Saratov face significant challenges, with a speed score of -1.00. Response times are slower than desired, impacting the overall effectiveness of urgent care.

Public Health Initiatives

Saratov has implemented public health initiatives aimed at improving healthcare delivery and accessibility. Efforts are focused on enhancing preventive care and managing chronic diseases within the community.

Equipment and Advancements

The availability of modern medical equipment in Saratov is limited, with a score of -0.82. This lack of advanced technology hinders the ability to provide cutting-edge medical treatments and diagnostics.

Worldwide
Russia

Healthcare Rankings

The Health Care Rankings for Russia evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in Russia, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.

Best to WorstUpdated: Feb, 2025
Saratov Healthcare

"Key Takeaways"

Saratov's healthcare system is heavily reliant on public insurance, with minimal private or employer-sponsored options.

The cost of healthcare is neutral, but the quality and speed of services are areas of concern.

Limited access to modern medical equipment affects the quality of care available to residents.