The following data and statistics on crime, pollution, and overall safety in Arilje are derived from a combination of trusted public sources and insights gathered from user contributions.

This comprehensive approach helps provide a balanced view of the city's crime rates, environmental concerns, air quality, and public safety. By aggregating information from government reports, environmental studies, and direct feedback from residents, we aim offer an up-to-date and thorough analysis of key factors impacting quality of life in Arilje.

Crime Data in Arilje

Crime Perception and Concerns

In 2024, the crime data for Arilje, Serbia indicates a neutral stance with no significant data showing public concern or noteworthy crime trends. This suggests either a very low crime rate or insufficient data collection in this area.

The safety index also remains unreported, hinting at the potential stability in public safety perceptions or a lack of comprehensive data.

Some notable concerns include:

  • Property Crimes - Data for property crimes, such as theft and burglary, show no significant public concern in Arilje, indicating either low crime occurrences in this category or a gap in available information.
  • Drug-Related Issues - No data suggests concerns regarding drug-related crimes in Arilje. This could point towards effective management or merely insufficient detection and reporting mechanisms.
  • Violent Crimes - In Arilje, there appears to be no notable fear surrounding violent crimes, as indicated by the absence of data. This could imply a peaceful community environment or a lack of detailed crime stats.
  • Public Safety - Public safety perceptions in Arilje seem neutral, with no specific concerns about being alone during the day or night reported. The lack of data suggests stable safety or a need for enhanced data gathering.

Crime Trends and Safety

  • Rising Crime Concerns - There are no recorded worries about rising crime rates in Arilje, indicating potential stability or a dearth of comprehensive crime reporting.
  • Specific Fears - Without specific fears about crime, Arilje may experience a sense of calm or require more detailed crime perception analysis to understand community dynamics better.

Summary of Crime in Arilje

Arilje's crime data presents a serene picture or perhaps a gap in reporting. To bolster public safety efforts, closer inspections or improved data collection methods could offer more insightful views in future assessments.

Worldwide
Serbia

Crime Rankings

The crime ranking by city for Serbia is based on a continuously updated index, incorporating data up to 36 months old and calculated twice a year. Cities are ranked on a scale from "very low" to "very high" crime levels, with safety being the inverse, where a high safety index indicates a safer city.

Highest to LowestUpdated: Feb, 2025

Pollution Data in Arilje

Air Quality and Pollution Levels

In Arilje, pollution data for 2024 remains undetailed, presenting a neutral picture concerning air quality and environmental conditions. This could suggest acceptable conditions or inadequate monitoring systems.

With no significant data, it's challenging to ascertain the level of particulate matter or overall satisfaction with air quality among Arilje's residents.

  • PM2.5 (Fine Particulate Matter) - There is no available data for PM2.5 levels in Arilje, suggesting either low pollution presence or insufficient environmental monitoring.
  • PM10 (Coarse Particulate Matter) - The lack of PM10 data could point to minimal pollution concerns or a need for better measurement systems to assess air quality dangers.

Waste and Noise Pollution

The absence of detailed data on noise and waste pollution in Arilje suggests potentially manageable levels or a lack of comprehensive reporting mechanisms.

Residents' perceptions of waste management and noise pollution are not captured, indicating a possible gap in communication or reporting systems.

  • Garbage Disposal Satisfaction - Without explicit data on garbage disposal satisfaction, the state of waste management in Arilje remains unclear, pointing to a need for more structured feedback channels.
  • Noise and Light Pollution - The unavailability of noise and light pollution statistics for Arilje suggests an undervaluation of their impacts or a deficiency in data collection practices.

Green Spaces and Water Quality

Although detailed data on Arilje’s green and park quality and water quality are not available, residents might feel positive about these aspects given the neutral data landscape.

The lack of drinking water quality data suggests no pressing concerns or inadequate data collection, signifying either high satisfaction or the opposite.

  • Green and Parks Quality - Green spaces and parks in Arilje remain unassessed in this data set, which may reflect well-maintained environments or a shortfall in evaluative procedures.
  • Drinking Water Quality - With an absence of specifics on water quality, it implies either no significant issues exist or that there are gaps in monitoring and evaluation practices for water resources in Arilje.
Worldwide
Serbia

Pollution Rankings

The pollution ranking for Serbia is based on a combination of visitor perceptions and data from institutions like the World Health Organization. The Pollution Index estimates overall pollution levels by considering air and water pollution, garbage disposal, and other factors, with air pollution given the highest weight, while the Pollution Exp Scale uses an exponential function to highlight extremely polluted cities.

Hightest to LowestUpdated: Feb, 2025
Arilje Crime and Pollution

"Key Takeaways"

Arilje, Serbia, presents a neutral landscape in terms of crime and pollution data, indicating either a peaceful environment or a shortfall in data availability.

Efforts in future data collection and community engagement could provide clearer insights into actual conditions, allowing for enhanced public safety strategies and environmental policies.

While comprehensive information is lacking, Arilje’s stability could be either implicitly understood as positive or an opportunity for policymakers to enhance existing frameworks for public and environmental welfare.