Zug, a picturesque city in Switzerland, is known for its efficient transportation system. In 2024, the primary mode of commuting is by car, accounting for over half of all trips. Despite the reliance on cars, Zug maintains a relatively low average commute time, with many residents also opting for walking and public transport options like trains and buses.

Average Commute Times

The average commute in Zug takes about 21.88 minutes, with a mix of driving, walking, and public transport.
  • Bus - Bus commuters spend approximately 10 minutes on their journey, including waiting and walking times.
  • Car - Car travel is the most common, with an average driving time of 23.86 minutes per trip.
  • Train - Train users experience a longer commute, averaging 20 minutes on the train and additional time for walking and bus connections.
  • Walking - Walking is a popular choice for short distances, with an average time of 6.67 minutes.
Traffic Breakdown
Car
54%
Walking
23%
Train
8%
Bus
8%
Home
8%
Seasonal Trends

Winter months see a slight increase in car usage due to colder weather, impacting commute times. Summer encourages more walking and cycling, reducing car traffic and emissions.

Commuter Pain Points

Traffic congestion during peak hours can lead to delays, particularly for car commuters. Limited parking availability in the city center adds to commuter stress.

Best Travel Times

Early mornings before 7 AM and late evenings after 7 PM are ideal for avoiding traffic congestion. Midday travel is generally smooth, with fewer delays across all transport modes.

Event Impacts

Public events in Zug, such as festivals and markets, can significantly increase traffic, especially in the city center. Event organizers often coordinate with local transport services to provide additional public transport options.

Sustainability Efforts

Zug is investing in expanding its public transport network to reduce car dependency. The city promotes cycling through improved infrastructure and bike-sharing programs.

Ride-Sharing Impact

Ride-sharing services are gaining popularity, offering flexible commuting options and reducing the need for personal car ownership. These services help alleviate parking issues and contribute to lower traffic congestion.

Worldwide
Switzerland

Traffic Rankings

The Traffic Index for Switzerland combines user-contributed data on commute times, traffic dissatisfaction, CO2 emissions, and traffic system inefficiencies in Switzerland, to provide insights into overall traffic conditions.

Worst to BestUpdated: Dec, 2024

Traffic Data

The following traffic data has been gathered from 13 user contributions.
Overall average travel
Distance
9.6 miles
Walking
3.5 mins
Waiting
0.4 mins
Driving Car
13.9 mins
Bus / Trolley
1.4 mins
Bicycle
0.4 mins
Motorcycle
0.0 mins
Train
2.3 mins
Total:
21.9 mins
Average when primarily using Bus
Distance
1.2 miles
Walking
2.0 mins
Waiting
1.0 mins
Bus / Trolley
7.0 mins
Total:
10.0 mins
Average when primarily using Car
Distance
12.8 miles
Walking
2.1 mins
Driving Car
23.9 mins
Total:
26.0 mins
Average when primarily using Train
Distance
18.6 miles
Walking
5.0 mins
Waiting
2.0 mins
Bus / Trolley
10.0 mins
Train
20.0 mins
Total:
37.0 mins
Average when primarily using Walking
Distance
2.1 miles
Walking
6.7 mins
Waiting
0.7 mins
Bicycle
1.5 mins
Motorcycle
0.0 mins
Train
2.3 mins
Total:
11.2 mins
Zug Traffic

"Key Takeaways"

Zug's reliance on cars contributes significantly to CO2 emissions, highlighting the need for sustainable transport solutions.

Promoting public transport and non-motorized travel could improve commute efficiency and reduce environmental impact.

Key Indexes

Emissions

Zug's CO2 emissions index is 3803.5, reflecting the environmental impact of car usage.

Efforts to reduce emissions could focus on increasing public transport and cycling options.

Time

The average commute time index is 21.88, indicating efficient travel times across the city.

Peak hours may see slight increases, but overall, the city manages traffic well.

Inefficiency

The inefficiency index stands at 118.96, suggesting room for improvement in reducing traffic delays.

Encouraging alternative transport modes could alleviate congestion.