Moscow, Idaho, presents a unique healthcare landscape characterized by a healthcare index of 58.33. The city relies heavily on public insurance, with no private or employer-sponsored insurance coverage reported. While the cost of healthcare is perceived as high, the system faces challenges in speed and accuracy.

Healthcare Accessibility and Coverage

Healthcare accessibility in Moscow is entirely dependent on public insurance, covering 100% of the population.

There is no reported coverage through employer-sponsored or private insurance, which may limit options for residents.

Coverage Breakdown
Public
100%

Cost of Healthcare

The cost of healthcare in Moscow is perceived as high, with a maximum score of 1.00. This suggests that despite public insurance coverage, residents may still face significant financial burdens.

Emergency Services and Speed

Emergency services in Moscow are challenged by a speed score of 0.00, indicating potential delays in urgent care. Improving response times could enhance the overall effectiveness of emergency medical services.

Public Health Initiatives

Public health initiatives in Moscow are crucial, given the reliance on public insurance. Efforts may focus on improving service delivery and addressing the high cost of care.

Equipment and Advancements

The score for modern equipment in Moscow is 0.00, suggesting limited access to advanced medical technology. This could impact the quality of care and the ability to provide cutting-edge treatments.

Worldwide
United States

Healthcare Rankings

The Health Care Rankings for the United States evaluates the quality of healthcare systems in United States, based on factors like professionals, equipment, and costs. It emphasizes the positive aspects of healthcare with an exponential scale, providing an assessment of healthcare quality and infrastructure.

Best to WorstUpdated: Dec, 2024
Full Healthcare Rankings
Moscow Healthcare

"Key Takeaways"

Moscow's healthcare system is heavily reliant on public insurance, with no private or employer-sponsored options.

The high cost of healthcare remains a significant concern for residents.

Emergency services face challenges in speed, potentially affecting urgent care delivery.

There is a need for investment in modern medical equipment to improve healthcare quality.